Employment status and qualification level of respondents

Figure 3.1.1

Employment status of all respondents

  Employed full-time Looking for work Employed part-time Student Self-employed Carer Retired Other
Percentage 45.7% 24.3% 14.2% 7.8% 3.6% 3.5% 1.8% 1.7%

Figure 3.1.1. Employment status of all respondents: 73.6% of respondents stated that they were currently employed, either as full-time, part-time, or in self-employment (45.7%, 24.3%, and 3.6% respectively). This is comparable to the resident population in which 71.2% were employed (1). A significant proportion of respondents claimed to be looking for work (24.3%) who will be a target group for vocational skills provision. Furthermore, respondents in part-time employment may also be persuaded to increase their hours or look for alternative full-time work, particularly as the cost-of-living crisis continues, and upskilling may be key for them to do so.

Figure 3.1.2

Employment status of respondents with a declared disability
  Employed full-time Employed part-time Student Self-employed Looking for work Carer Other Retired
Disability 49.4% 12.1% 10.8% 8.7% 8.2% 7.8% 3.5% 1.3%
All respondents 45.7% 14.2% 7.8% 3.6% 24.3% 3.5% 1.7% 1.8%

Figure 3.1.2. Employment status of respondents with a declared disability: Less respondents who declared a disability were looking for work when compared to the total number of respondents (8.2% compared to 24.3%).

Figure 3.1.3

Employment status of respondents by gender
  Employed full-time Looking for work Employed part-time Student Carer Self-employed Other Retired
Female 40.8% 21.4% 18.1% 9.6% 4.4% 3.8% 2.2% 0.8%
Male 50.4% 25.7% 10.6% 6.6% 2.4% 3.4% 1.6% 1.9%

Figure 3.1.3. Employment status of respondents by gender: More male respondents were in some form of employment than female respondents (64.4% and 62.7% respectively). However, the gap between the genders was considerably smaller than the resident population of Coventry (78% of males in employment compared to 66.7% for females. On the other hand, there was a larger gender gap between full-time employed respondents with 50.4% of males in full-time employment compared to 40.8% of females. Furthermore, more male respondents stated that they were looking for work than female respondents (25.7% and 21.4% respectively) despite more male respondents stating that they were currently in employment. This is reflective, although to a lesser extent, of the resident population of Coventry in which there is a +11.2 percentage point gap between the percentage of women who are economically inactive and the percentage of economically inactive men.

Figure 3.1.4

Figure 3.1.4 Employment status of respondents by age
  Employed full-time Looking for work Employed part-time Student Carer Self-employed Other Retired
16-24 44.4% 26.4% 11.1% 16% 2.1% 2.8% 0.7% 1.4%
25-49 47.9% 22.3% 15.1% 6.9% 4.2% 4% 1.5% 0.4%
50+ 38.5% 25.7% 13.8% 2.8% 1.8% 2.8% 4.6% 10.1%

Figure 3.1.4. Employment status of respondents by age: As expected, the younger the age bracket of respondents, the higher the percentage that were currently students (16.0% of 16-24-year-olds, 6.9% of 25-49-year-olds, and 2.8% of 50+). There was a higher percentage of 25-49 age bracket respondents currently in all types of employment compared to 16-24 and 50+ respondents, and as such, the inverse was the case with respondents claiming they are currently looking for work (22.3% of 25-49-year-olds compared to 26.4% and 25.7% of 16-24 and 50+ respectively).

Figure 3.1.5

Figure 3.1.5. Employment status of respondents by ethnicity
  Employed full time Looking for work Employed part-time Student Self-employed Carer Retired Other
White British backgrounds* 62.8% 14.1% 8.8% 5% 3.1% 2.5% 3.1% 2.2%
White Other backgrounds* 41.6% 13.9% 22.3% 7.2% 6% 7.8% 1.2% 0.6%

Black Backgrounds*

20.6% 49.2% 9.5% 6.3% 3.2% 1.6% 0% 3.2%
Asian Backgrounds* 25.1% 40.8% 17.3% 14% 2.2% 0.6% 0.6% 1.7%

Figure 3.1.5. Employment status of respondents by ethnicity: All ethnic minority groups had a significantly lower full-time employment rate than White British* respondents, reflective of the employment status of the resident population (2), with respondents from Asian backgrounds* representing the lowest level followed by Black backgrounds* (25.1% and 31.6% compared to 62.8% of White British* respondents). White Other backgrounds* represented the highest level of part-time employment followed by Asian background* groups (22.3% and 17.3%) with White British* groups representing the lowest level of part-time employment (8.8%). Asian* and Black* background groups had the highest proportion of respondents who were currently looking for work (40.8% and 36.8% respectively) whereas White Other* groups had the lowest (13.9%).

Figure 3.2.1

Figure 3.2.1. Highest level of qualification of all respondents
  No qualification Entry level Level 1 Level 2  Level 3 Above Level 3
Total respondents 3.3% 14.2% 20.5% 20.9% 15.3% 25.7%
Coventry 7.5% 7.6% 8.4% 17.7% 18.2% 40.7%

Figure 3.2.1. Highest level of qualification of all respondents: Overall, survey respondents had a lower qualification level than the resident population of Coventry (1), with a higher proportion being educated to Entry Level, Level 1, or Level 2 (14.2%, 20.5% and 20.9% respectively). Nonetheless, the majority of respondents were educated above level 3 (25.7%). This is expected, as residents who are actively looking for skills provision, and thus expected to be less qualified, were most likely to have engaged with the survey.

Figure 3.2.2

Figure 3.2.2. Highest level of qualification of respondents with a declared disability
  No qualifications Entry level  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Above Level 3
Disability 1.7% 26.6% 28.4% 24.5% 8.7% 10%
Total respondents 3.3% 14.2% 20.5% 20.9% 15.3% 25.7%

Figure 3.2.2. Highest level of qualification of respondents with a declared disability: Respondents with a declared disability, on average, had a lower qualification level than that of total survey respondents: only 18.7% of disabled respondents were qualified to level 3 or above, compared to 41% of total survey respondents, whereas 26.6% of disabled respondents were only qualified to entry-level compared to 14.2% of total respondents.

Figure 3.2.3

Figure 3.2.3. Highest level of qualification of respondents by gender
  No qualifications Entry level  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Above Level 3
Female 3.3% 11.9% 21% 20.4% 14.9% 28.5%
Male 3.7% 17.5% 20.4% 19.6% 16.1% 22.8%

Figure 3.2.3. Highest level of qualification of respondents by gender: More male respondents were educated to Entry Level than female respondents (17.5% compared to 11.9%) whereas more female respondents than male respondents were educated above level 3 (28.5% compared to 22.8%).

Figure 3.2.4

Figure 3.2.4. Highest level of qualification of respondents by age
  No qualifications Entry level Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Above Level 3
16-24 3.5% 16.1% 24.5% 26.6% 15.4% 14%
25-49 2.9% 15.4% 21.5% 21.3% 13.1% 25.7%
50+ 5.6% 6.5% 9.3% 12.1% 26.2% 40.2%

Figure 3.2.4

Figure 3.2.4. Highest level of qualification of respondents by age: The older the age of the respondent the higher qualified they are likely to be: 40.2% of 50+ respondents were educated above level 3 compared to only 14% of 16–24-year-olds and 25.7% of 25-49-year-olds, whereas 51.1% of 16-24-year-olds were educated up to either Level 1 or Level 2 compared to 42.8% of 25-49-year-olds and 21.4% of 50+ respondents.

Figure 3.2.5

Figure 3.2.5. Highest level of qualification of respondents by ethnicity
  No qualifications Entry level Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Above Level 3
White British Backgrounds* 3.1% 19.1% 18.5% 21.3% 19.7% 18.2%
White Other Backgrounds*  3.7% 10.5% 32.1% 30.2% 7.4% 16%
Black Backgrounds* 9.5% 6.3% 12.7% 12.7% 20.6% 31.7%
Asian Backgrounds* 1.1% 12.5% 15.3% 14.2% 13.1% 43.8%

Figure 3.2.5. Highest level of qualification of respondents by ethnicity: Asian* and Black* ethnic groups were the highest qualified groups with 43.8% and 31.7% of respondents from these groups qualified above level 3. However, Black* respondents were the highest scoring ethnic group to have no qualifications with 9.5% falling into this category. White Other* respondents were the least qualified overall, with 32.1% qualified up to Level 1 and 30.2% qualified up to Level 2. However, White British* groups were the highest represented group to only hold ‘entry level’ qualifications (19.1%).